Next: 7.3.2 Are the trends
Up: 7.3 The validity of
Previous: 7.3 The validity of
Is the mass balance really satisfied in the ``common'' model?
Lets examine this point.
Equation (
) states that the mass (volume, under
constant density) balance is exist.
So, what is the condition on to satisfy this condition?
Can be a constant as stated in assumption 1?
To study this point let derive an expression for .
Utilizing equation (
) yields
From the machine characteristic, equation (
),
it can be shown that
Substituting equation (
)
into equation (
) yield,
It can be shown that equation (
) can be transformed
into
According to the ``common'' model , and are independent
of the gate area, .
The term
is not a constant and is a
function of (possibility other parameters).
To maintain the mass balance must be a function at least
of the gate area, .
Since the ``common'' diagram assumes that is a constant
it diametrically opposite the mass conservation principle.
Moreover, in the ``common'' model, a major assumption is that
the value of depends on the metal, therefore,
the mass balance is probably never achieved in many cases.
This violation demonstrates, once for all, that the ``common'' diagram
is erroneous.
Figure:
as to be relocated
|
Figure:
as A3 to be relocated
|
Next: 7.3.2 Are the trends
Up: 7.3 The validity of
Previous: 7.3 The validity of
Contents
Genick Bar-Meir ||| www.potto.org
copyright Dec , 2006
The pdf version is also available here